The topic is Audience from text book of Professional writing or business writing, the author is (Locker and Kacmarek) it essay should be with out grammatical errors and not copied from the internet please. two source only from the text book. Audience Assignment,Format and Length Requirements: memo (Module 9 – page 146), 2-4 pages.
As indicated in the syllabus and classroom discussion, this course is almost evenly divided between dealing with academic and business writing. And, since some of you may be new to your discipline, this particular assignment is designed to allow you to familiarize yourself with the requirements and conventions of working within your scholarly discourse communities?
The readers and writers who \”share assumptions about what channels, formats, and styles to use, what topics to discuss and how to discuss them, and what constitutes evidence\” (Locker and Kaczmarek).
In other words, this assignment allows you to learn more about one aspect of your community map?your professional academic community (see lecture notes, Unit 1, part 2 for the community map discussion). In another sense, this assignment requires that you implement what you\’ve been learning.
You’ll need to adapt your message to an audience (in this case, your instructor) as well as apply the principles of you-attitude, positive emphasis, and reader benefits as you make decisions about how to organize your information in paragraphs and about what information (or details/evidence) to include to support your points.
In order to accomplish these tasks, you\’ll be completing a rhetorical analysis of sorts. Essentially, you will analyze the written discourse of the audience you\’re joining by earning a degree (professionals within your field).
Your assignment is to identify a leading scholarly journal in your field and read two articles from two different issues of the journal. The articles should be at least 5 pages in length, and they cannot be book reviews. The articles should include research. (You\’ll find some suggestions at the end of the page about appropriate scholarly journals.)
Look at the articles and examine style, level of formality, types of evidence (kinds of information) presented as support for arguments, and level of technicality of evidence and presentation. Essentially, you\’re looking for commonalities among these articles that reveal how your discipline communicates (as the articles represent the formal discourse of your discipline).
Please include at the end of your memo the name of the publication, the titles of the two articles you\’ve chosen, the articles\’ authors, the dates the articles were published, and the page numbers. In a memo to me, describe the preferences of the discourse community represented by the journal you chose. You can find information on formatting memos in Module 9.
Divide your memo into categories that discuss the following. A description of the texts. Questions you may wish to consider include ? What are the purposes of the texts? By what methods are the purposes achieved? ? What format elements are consistent among both articles?
Headings? Documentation style (APA, MLA, Chicago)? ?
How difficult is the word choice? Are buzz words or jargon used? Are the words simple and short or are they more than two or three syllables? ? How is the piece organized? ? Are the conclusions reached based on logical reasoning?
Do the conclusions follow from the premises? Are the arguments valid and sound? Are some important points taken as assumptions with no evidence for support? Do these assumptions seem reasonable and would the intended reader find them so? ?
Are most of the sentences relatively long or relatively short? Is there sentence variety within most paragraphs? ? How long are the paragraphs?
How many words are typical? How many sentences? ? What is the nature of the technical material ?
Theory? Equations? Models?
Are visuals used to present technical materials or to explain it? ? What kinds of evidence are presented? Examples, personal experience, logical arguments, statistics, appeals to recognized authority? ?
How does the text create goodwill? How are reader benefits treated: Are they presented implicitly or explicitly? ?
What kinds of evidence are presented? Examples, personal experience, logical arguments, statistics, appeals to recognized authority? ? How does the text create goodwill? How are reader benefits treated: Are they presented implicitly or explicitly? ?
How does the writer build the text to meet the needs of the reader? A description of the intended audience of the articles. Questions you may wish to consider include ? Who is/are the intended audience(s) of the articles? ? What beliefs and values does the audience seem to hold? ?
How does the writer appeal to the beliefs and values of the reader? ?
What level of technical knowledge does the audience have? ? How much explanation of technical material does the audience require? ?
What are the audience\’s attitudes toward the material? Toward the writer? ? What objections or negative attitudes might the audience have? ? What kind of evidence seems to be preferred by the audience?? How does the writer build the text to meet the needs of the reader?
A description of the writers.
Questions you may wish to consider include ? Who are the writers? What do you know about their backgrounds? ? What is the writer\’s level of technical knowledge in relation to the readers\’ level of knowledge? ? What effect does the writer want the text to have on the reader?
3 ? What are the implied writer\’s attitudes toward the audience? Toward the information he or she is presenting?
Toward the scholarly community? Toward himself or herself? ? How formal is the writer, based on his or her relationship with the intended reader? Your memo should have an introduction. The introduction should identify the purpose of the memo and its audience. It should also specify your discipline and the journal.
4. Your memo also should have a conclusion. In the conclusion you might tell me what you\’ve learned about your scholarly discourse community and its communication.
5. You should avoid lengthy verbatim quotations or paraphrases from the original articles. The majority of your paper should consist of your own discussion based on your analysis of the articles. You should bring in examples from the text as you need to in order to prove your points?try to summarize these.
Be specific when you bring in support and indicate which articles prove your point and how they do so.
6. You should avoid just answering the questions listed above in the order they appear. You may not need to answer every question, and there may be questions of your own that you develop as you read the articles. At any rate, your discussion should be a thoughtfully organized within the three main sections that are outlined above.
7. If the journal has a website, check it out. Look for the submission requirements and other requirements that the journal has. They may give you insight into the expectations of the journal and its intended audience.
8. Good college paper writing service comes from rewriting. Usually, this means writing drafts early and allowing plenty of time to revise.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more