Idealism vs. Realism in International Politics\” Please respond to the following discussion question: maybe with 400 words Roskin and Berry allude to the tendency toward idealism in international politics before WWII ended in 1945, but the tendency toward realism after that year. •Explain what the authors mean by “idealism” and “realism” in international politics. •Characterize the differences between the world before 1945 and the world after that year with respect to international relations. •Explain the causes of the transition (from idealism to realism). note Student\’s post indicates thoughtful analysis and provides valuable insight into the topic. Student thoroughly addresses all elements of the discussion prompt, and demonstrates an advanced knowledge of the topic. Student makes strong and precise connections to previous and/or current course content, or to real- life situations, in initial post. Perspectives are supported with credible sources and uses consistency in documentation. Please respond with 100 to 150 words to this student post Explain what the authors mean by “idealism” and “realism” in internationalpolitics. When Roskin and Berry speak of idealism in internationalpolitics they are referring to our leaders making decisions and policies based on learned religious moral values, society’s norms and ethics, and legal rights and responsibilities both nationally and internationally (Roskin & Berry, 2010, pg. 57). One example of political idealist was President Woodrow Wilson who believed that world politics and disputes should be negotiated with legal agreements founded in mutual moralities between countries (Roskin & Berry, 2010, pg. 26). When Roskin and Berry speak of realism ininternational politics they are referring to our leaders making decisions and policies based on a fundamental need to gain global political power in order to spread democracy, freedom of religion and capitalism to the world. This approach was first applied nationally as Manifest Destiny and later by Imperialism. The underlying thought is that if America wants to be strong and stable than we need to impose our national beliefs globally, so that the World can also become more economically, socially, and morally aligned. Student responds with thorough and constructive analysis to the required number of peers, relating the response to relevant course concepts. Student may pose pertinent follow-up thoughts or questions about the topic, and demonstrates respect for the diverse opinions of fellow learners

You Might Also Be Interested in:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

five × 3 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.