Home » Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet

Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies.

Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice.

Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice.
ead over each of the following directions, the required Reading Research Literature worksheet, and grading rubric.
Download and complete the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet (Links to an external site.).
Download or access the required article. The required article must be used.

de Araujo, D. D., Silva, D. V. A., Rodrigues, C. A. O., Silva, P. O., Macieira, T. G. R., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2019). Effectiveness of nursing interventions to prevent dry eye in critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 28(4), 299–306.You must use the grading rubric to ensure you are meeting all grading criteria of the worksheet.
You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad.

NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric
NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the Study
Using information from the required article and mostly your words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Provide details.
30.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
26.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
24.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.
11.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of Research & the Design
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings/Discussion
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReading Research Literature
Summarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Provide details.
30.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
26.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
24.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
11.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar
10.0 pts
Excellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors or 1-2 errors noted.
6.0 pts
Good writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.
4.0 pts
Fair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.
3.0 pts
Poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.
0.0 pts
Very poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences
10.0 pts
Excellent APA in-text formatting with no errors. Uses mostly your own words with no more than two direct quotes.
5.0 pts
Good APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.
4.0 pts
Fair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.
3.0 pts
Poor APA formatting with many errors noted.
0.0 pts
Very poor APA with errors noted throughout.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired RRL Worksheet and Required Article Use
0.0 pts
0 points deducted Required RRL Worksheet used for this assignment and Required Article used for this assignment. 0 points deducted
0.0 pts
20 points (10%) deducted Required RRL Worksheet NOT used and/or Required Article NOT used for this assignment results in a deduction of 20 points (10%). 20 points deducted
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0.0 pts
0 point deduction
Submitted on time
0.0 pts
Not submitted on time – Points deducted
1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0

5240- wk 10 – Assignment what is unique about social and community-based organizations

Behavior Analysis: A teenager with autism who is having difficulty maintaining appropriate physical boundaries with others

Corporate Accounts Facility Plan

PSY 258: Midterm Exam: Distinguish between management and leadership

Human Resource Planning and Organizational Strategy

7-1 Discussion: Stress and Teams

Monroe’s Motivated Sequence: Identify a persuasive argument that compelled you to change your mind

PROGRAM EVALUATION – Critical Literature Review Assignment

Personal and Social Consequences in Substance Abuse and Dependence

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation Guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more